2.4 C
New York
Thursday, March 27, 2025
spot_img
Home Blog Page 2

Canelo Alvarez Gets the Benefit of Doubt for Ignoring the WBC Belt During William Scull Press Conference- “Obviously Marketing Reasons”

Lucas Peterson
-
0
Canelo Alvarez Gets the Benefit of Doubt for Ignoring the WBC Belt During William Scull Press Conference- “Obviously Marketing Reasons”

When the second oldest belt in the promotion is blocked, questions are bound to be raised. Recently, the WBC, WBO, and WBA super middleweight champion Anglo Alvarez met the IBF champion William Full in New York ahead of their fight on May 3. The Riyadh Reason bout of the undisputed 168 title is an essential event and will set the stage for Cinnamon‘s deal with the Audit.

While the event was rather routine, a moment during the final photo raised many eyebrows. It happened when His Excellency posed for pictures alongside the super middleweight do. While Burke Alalshikhp proudly displayed the King Magazine title alongside the undisputed title on the line, he denied Anglo’s trainer Eddy Reynoso to bring the WBC title on the stage.

The incident significantly raised questions about boxing’s future. Furthermore, with the GEA chairman making a new boxing promotion with Ana White, the questions are becoming rampart. Is the chaos is unfolding, Mexican boxing legend Like Fascia shares his opinion on the situation and what every belt means for the boxers.

Anglo Alvarez had no other choice

In Sunday, Like Fascia had a conversation with FightHype. With the WBC belt incident becoming the talk of the town, the interview asked the former four-division champion about it. After all, Fascia has been one of the best WBC lightweight champions the world has ever seen. However, it turns out that the 37-year-old had no idea about what went down. “I didn’t see, I don’t know what to make of it. I’m not sure what happened,” he stated.

The interview informed Fascia about how His Excellency is trying to elevate the ‘King Magazine’ belt in his new promotion. While the majority of the boxing world is doubtful regarding the King belt being the local point, Fascia is fine with it. He also understood why Anglo Alvarez could not bring the belt on the stage after being denied. “It’s his belt now. To he’s going to push you know for. I mean it’s obviously marketing reasons and promotion reasons. I’m not against anything like that either. I mean if there’s any number one belt. Maybe they’re trying to clean up so many titles,” he said, excusing Anglo Alvarez of not bringing the belt on the stage.

According to him, “Is a fighter I appreciate every belt.” Furthermore, it is the same for every fighter who wants to become a world champion. He added, “There’s four major sanctioning bodies starting with WBO, WBA, WBC, IBF, they’re all very valuable they’re they’re worth the same in a boxer’s eyes.” It is only media that creates the narrative of one title being greater than the other. However, for a boxer, “becoming world champion is what matters the most,” no matter the organization, stated the legendary fighter.

While Like Fascia is completely fine with King Magazine taking the center stage, WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman thinks otherwise.

WBC vs The King Magazine

His is not the first time that tension between the World Boxing Council and the Audit have surface. The cracks first appeared last year when His Excellency described the current state of boxing as “broken.”

The statement did not sit right with WBC president Mauricio Sulaiman, who fired back defending his organization. “I’m very upset because they just declared a few days ago that the banking of the organizations are corrupt. And if you touch my WBC, I’m going to fight back,” stated Sulaiman.

The WBC president declared the King belt as irrelevant in front of four major organizations while branding the magazine as based. “I don’t care about The King Magazine because they are a business; they make money, they are based. And that is not boxing. Boxing is what you see here: the world of boxing united to make boxing better and safer. A paper magazine warding a belt has no meaning,” he declared.

Following that, WBC refuse to sanction a potential undisputed light heavyweight match between Arthur Beterbiev and Dmitri Civil because of the organization’s position with Russia during the war. While the issue was resolved later on, the tension were quite visible. Furthermore, the recent incident involving Anglo Alvarez and William Full is only going to intensify this rivalry.

The new partnership between Audit and TKO management will further change the scenario of boxing, and there might be no better time to be a boxing fan. That do you think?

The Role of Ukraine’s NATO Aspirations in the Russian Invasion!

Jacob Weizman
-
0
The Role of Ukraine’s NATO Aspirations in the Russian Invasion!

Ukraine’s interest in joining NATO has been longstanding, with its aspirations formalized in its constitution in 2019. At the 2008 Bucharest Summit, NATO agreed that Ukraine would eventually become a member, but no specific timeline or Membership Action Plan (MAP) was provided.

Pre-Invasion Developments

In the months leading up to Russia’s February 2022 invasion:

  1. NATO and Ukraine intensified their partnership, building on cooperation that had deepened since Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea.
  2. Tensions escalated as Russia massed troops near Ukraine’s borders in late 2021.
  3. NATO maintained its “open-door” policy but Ukraine’s path to membership remained stalled due to lack of consensus among NATO members, ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, and concerns about corruption and democratic reforms.
  4. The U.S. under President Biden supported Ukraine’s sovereignty but emphasized that membership was not imminent, stating Ukraine needed to address corruption and meet NATO standards.

Russia’s Position

Russia strongly opposed Ukraine’s potential NATO membership, viewing it as a threat to its security. In December 2021, Russia issued demands for legally binding guarantees against NATO’s eastward expansion, specifically barring Ukraine from joining.

Diplomatic Efforts

  1. A virtual summit between Putin and Biden took place on December 7, 2021, where Putin pressed for denying Ukraine’s NATO bid.
  2. Diplomatic exchanges continued, with a meeting planned between U.S. Secretary of State Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov for February 24, 2022, which was canceled when Russia invaded that day.

Recent Developments

  1. In September 2022, following Russia’s attempted annexations of Ukrainian territory, Ukraine formally submitted an application to become a NATO member.
  2. At the 2023 Vilnius summit, NATO waived the need for a Membership Action Plan for Ukraine.
  3. The 2024 Washington Summit reaffirmed that Ukraine’s future is in NATO, but did not extend a formal invitation. NATO described Ukraine’s path to membership as “irreversible” but stated that an invitation would be extended when “Allies agree and conditions are met.”
  4. As of February 2025, NATO continues to support Ukraine’s progress on interoperability and reforms, but a specific timeline for membership has not been set.
  5. Recent statements from U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth suggest that Ukraine joining NATO is currently seen as unrealistic.
  6. On February 23, 2025, President Volodymir Zelenskyy indicated a willingness to “give up” his presidency in exchange for peace, highlighting the ongoing complexities of the situation.

These updates reflect the evolving nature of Ukraine-NATO relations and the ongoing challenges in the region.

The Epstein Files Unveiled: A First Glimpse into a Shadowy Legacy

Adrian Fuller
-
0
The Epstein Files Unveiled: A First Glimpse into a Shadowy Legacy

In a move that has reignited public fascination and outrage, U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi (on X) announced the release of the first tranche of declassified documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein, the infamous financier whose crimes cast a long shadow over the American justice system. Dubbed the “Epstein Files,” this initial batch—spanning over 3,000 pages—marks the opening chapter of what Bondi promises will be a broader effort to peel back the layers of secrecy surrounding Epstein’s case. But as the public pores over these records, the question looms: will transparency deliver justice, or merely deepen the wounds of a system already strained by distrust?

The Announcement

Attorney General Pamela Bondi
US Attorney General Pamela Bondi

Attorney General Pamela Bondi, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), declassified and publicly released files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his sexual exploitation of over 250 underage girls.

The announcement, made on February 27, 2025, from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), frames this declassification as a response to years of pressure from victims, advocates, and a public hungry for answers. Epstein, whose 2019 death in a Manhattan jail cell remains shrouded in controversy, left behind a legacy of unanswered questions: How did a man with such wealth and influence evade accountability for so long? Who enabled him? And why did the justice system seem to falter at every turn? The release of these documents—covering investigations from 2006 to 2019—offers a partial glimpse into the machinery of his crimes and the government’s response. Yet, it’s what remains hidden that may prove most telling.

What’s in the Files?

This first phase, as outlined by Bondi, includes investigative reports, court filings, and correspondence tied to Epstein’s activities across multiple jurisdictions—Florida, New York, and the U.S. Virgin Islands chief among them. The documents detail his trafficking network, which preyed on vulnerable young women and minors, and hint at the complicity of a web of powerful figures. Names, dates, and locations spill across the pages, painting a chilling picture of systemic exploitation. Notably, the release also sheds light on the controversial 2008 non-prosecution agreement in Florida—a deal that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to lesser state charges while dodging federal prosecution, a decision that has long fueled accusations of a two-tiered justice system.

Bondi hailed the move as a victory for transparency, stating, “The American people deserve to know the truth about Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes and the systemic failures that allowed them to persist.” She emphasized that this is only the beginning, with additional releases planned as part of a phased rollout. A dedicated DOJ website now hosts these files, complete with a searchable database—a nod to accessibility that doubles as a challenge to journalists, lawyers, and citizens to dig deeper.

What is in the Epstein files

The Legal and Cultural Fallout

From a legal perspective, the declassification is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it could bolster civil lawsuits still pending against Epstein’s estate and alleged co-conspirators, providing plaintiffs with fresh evidence to pursue justice. Victims’ attorneys are likely already combing through the files, looking for leverage in cases that have languished in legal limbo. On the other hand, the passage of time—and Epstein’s death—complicates criminal accountability. Statutes of limitations, sealed plea deals, and the absence of key witnesses may render much of these revelations symbolic rather than actionable.

Beyond the courtroom, the Epstein Files strike at the heart of a broader cultural reckoning. The #MeToo era has exposed the rot within elite circles, yet Epstein’s case stands apart for its sheer scale and the impunity it represents. The documents name prominent individuals—politicians, business magnates, even royalty—whose associations with Epstein have long been whispered about but rarely substantiated in open court. While redactions protect some identities (for now), the specter of future releases hangs heavy. Will the powerful finally face scrutiny, or will this become another chapter of outrage without consequence?

A System on Trial

Perhaps the most provocative question raised by this declassification is not about Epstein himself, but the institutions that failed to stop him. The files reveal missed opportunities—investigations stalled, tips ignored, and deals struck behind closed doors. The 2008 Florida agreement, brokered by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, emerges as a flashpoint once again. Acosta’s subsequent rise to Labor Secretary under President Trump, only to resign amid backlash in 2019, underscores how Epstein’s case became a litmus test for trust in government. Bondi, a Trump-era appointee herself, now inherits this legacy. Her pledge to “restore faith in our justice system” through transparency will be judged not just by what’s released, but by what’s withheld—and why.

The phased approach to declassification adds another layer of intrigue. The DOJ cites “national security, privacy, and ongoing investigative concerns” as reasons for holding back certain documents. Critics will undoubtedly cry foul, arguing that such caveats shield the influential rather than the innocent. The Epstein saga has always been a conspiracy magnet—his death, ruled a suicide, still fuels theories of foul play—and this partial unveiling risks feeding that skepticism rather than quelling it.

What Comes Next?

As The Cyber Voice readers know, the intersection of money, power, and corruption is rarely tidy. The Epstein Files, even in this initial form, are a Pandora’s box—exposing enough to provoke fury but not enough to resolve it. The promise of subsequent releases keeps the story alive, ensuring that Epstein’s ghost will haunt headlines for months, if not years, to come. For victims, it’s a bittersweet moment: validation of their suffering, yet a reminder that full reckoning remains elusive.

The challenge now falls to us—the public, the press, the legal community—to wrestle with these documents and demand more. If the Epstein Files teach us anything, it’s that sunlight alone isn’t justice. It’s what we do with it that matters. As Bondi prepares the next phase, the clock ticks on a system desperate to prove it can still hold the powerful to account—or at least convince us it’s trying.

Amazon MGM Studios Secures Creative Control of James Bond Franchise for $1 Billion

Adrian Fuller
-
0
Amazon MGM Studios Secures Creative Control of James Bond Franchise for $1 Billion

In a groundbreaking deal that has sent waves through the entertainment industry, Amazon MGM Studios has acquired full creative control of the iconic James Bond franchise. The agreement, finalized on February 20, 2025, marks the end of an era for the beloved spy series and signals a new chapter in its storied history.

The Deal

Amazon MGM Studios has formed a joint venture with longtime Bond producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli, housing the James Bond intellectual property rights. While all parties will remain co-owners, Amazon MGM Studios will now have complete creative control over the 007 franchise. The deal reportedly cost Amazon an additional $1 billion, on top of the $8.5 billion it spent to acquire MGM in 2022.

Industry Reactions

The announcement has elicited mixed reactions from industry insiders and fans alike. Some view it as a potential opportunity for fresh perspectives and expanded storytelling possibilities, while others express concern about the franchise’s future under corporate control.

Mike Hopkins, head of Prime Video and Amazon MGM Studios, stated, “We are honoured to continue this treasured heritage, and look forward to ushering in the next phase of the legendary 007 for audiences around the world.”

Implications for the Franchise

With Amazon at the helm, speculation is rife about potential changes to the Bond universe:

  1. Expanded Content: There’s a possibility of more Bond projects, including potential spin-offs and TV series.
  2. Increased Production Pace: The franchise may see more frequent releases, moving away from the traditional multi-year gaps between films.
  3. Cinematic Universe: Some industry analysts predict Amazon’s desire to expand James Bond into its own universe, similar to Marvel or Star Wars.

Historical Context

The deal marks a significant shift in the Bond franchise’s management. For over 60 years, the Broccoli family has carefully stewarded James Bond’s cinematic journey, maintaining creative control and personally steering the direction of the films.

Looking Ahead

As the entertainment landscape continues to evolve, with streaming giants increasingly dominating content creation, the future of James Bond under Amazon’s creative control remains to be seen. While some fans worry about potential over-commercialization, others are excited about the prospects of a reinvigorated and expanded Bond universe.

The deal is expected to close later this year, setting the stage for a new era in the world of 007.

The Real Roots of the Ukraine War: Unmasking the Narrative with Jeffrey Sachs’ Lens

Jacob Weizman
-
0
The Real Roots of the Ukraine War: Unmasking the Narrative with Jeffrey Sachs’ Lens

For years, the mainstream media—cheerleaders for the Biden administration’s foreign policy—have peddled a simplistic tale: Vladimir Putin, the unhinged aggressor, launched an “unprovoked” war on Ukraine in February 2022, leaving the West no choice but to arm Kyiv to the teeth. This narrative, parroted relentlessly by outlets like The New York Times (which has used “unprovoked” no fewer than 26 times in its coverage), has shaped public perception into a black-and-white morality play.

But what if this is a lie by omission, a carefully curated distortion that obscures a deeper, messier truth? Enter Jeffrey Sachs (website)—economist, Columbia University professor, and a rare voice of dissent—who argues that the Ukraine war’s origins lie not in Moscow’s paranoia but in Washington’s provocations, particularly through NATO’s eastward creep. As a political analyst for The Cyber Voice, I’ll peel back the layers of this conflict, spotlight Sachs’ hypothesis, and expose how the media’s complicity has fueled a proxy war—with Ukraine as the sacrificial pawn.

The Sachs Hypothesis: NATO Expansion as the Spark

Sachs doesn’t mince words: “This is a war that never should have happened.” Far from an impulsive Russian land grab, he contends the conflict was ignited by decades of U.S.-led NATO expansion, a policy that deliberately poked the Russian bear until it lashed out. In his view, the critical flashpoint came with Ukraine’s flirtation with NATO membership—a red line for Moscow that the West knowingly crossed. Sachs points to broken promises from the 1990s, when U.S. and German leaders assured Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO wouldn’t move “one inch eastward” after the Warsaw Pact dissolved. Yet, by the early 2000s, NATO had swallowed up former Soviet satellites, and by 2008, it dangled membership before Ukraine and Georgia—moves Sachs calls “reckless provocations.”

Fast forward to 2021: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, emboldened by Biden’s unwavering support, doubled down on NATO aspirations. Sachs highlights Putin’s December 2021 draft treaty, which demanded a halt to NATO enlargement—a plea the Biden administration dismissed outright. On X, users like

@Glenn_Diesen(X account) echo Sachs, noting on February 13, 2025: “The 2014 coup in Ukraine that started a decade of war: – The US ambassador to Russia (and later CIA Director) William Burns warned in 2008 that pulling a divided Ukraine into the NATO orbit would trigger a civil war and Russia would reluctantly intervene militarily.” The implication? Zelensky didn’t just provoke Putin; he was a willing tool in a U.S. strategy to encircle Russia, with NATO as the battering ram.

Biden’s Gambit: Zelensky as Proxy, Putin as Prey

The mainstream media’s portrayal of Putin as the sole villain conveniently sidesteps Biden’s role as puppet master. Sachs argues that the U.S., under Biden, saw Ukraine as a geopolitical chess piece to weaken Russia. Billions in military aid—over $65 billion by 2025—poured into Kyiv, not to defend democracy but to bleed Moscow dry. The Biden administration’s refusal to negotiate with Putin in 2021, despite his overtures, underscores this agenda. Sachs told Mandiner in 2023: “Had Biden agreed NATO wouldn’t enlarge, this war wouldn’t have happened.” Instead, Biden doubled down, cheerleading Zelensky’s NATO dreams while the media spun it as righteous defiance.

This wasn’t about Ukraine’s sovereignty—it was about U.S. dominance. Sachs notes a near-miss peace deal in March 2022, brokered by Turkey, where Zelensky accepted neutrality. Mysteriously, it collapsed—Sachs suspects U.S. pressure, a claim bolstered by former UK PM Boris Johnson’s trip to Kyiv to nix the deal. On X,

Alan Watson quotes Jeffrey Sachs

@DietHeartNews recently posted (February 23, 2025): “Sachs: ‘I’m against Ukrainians being killed by the hundreds of thousands because the US wants military bases on Russia’s border.’” The media? Silent on this angle, preferring to lionize Zelensky as a wartime hero while burying the body count.

Media Manipulation: The Unprovoked Lie

The mainstream media’s complicity is breathtaking. Sachs has called out The New York Times and its ilk for their “parrot-like repetition” of the Biden line—Putin’s aggression as the alpha and omega of the war. This isn’t journalism; it’s propaganda. By framing Russia’s invasion as unprovoked, they erase decades of NATO provocation and Biden’s meddling.

This isn’t just bias—it’s a deliberate rewrite of history. Orwell warned, “Who controls the past controls the future,” and the Biden-era press has played gatekeeper, shielding the public from inconvenient truths. The result? A war prolonged, Ukraine ravaged, and Putin vilified while the U.S. hides its fingerprints.

Trump’s Pivot: Peace Without Pawns?

Enter Donald Trump, whose recent moves signal a tectonic shift. As of February 2025, Trump’s team is negotiating directly with Putin, sidelining Zelensky and Europe—a stark rebuke to Biden’s multilateral crusade. Reports from BBC and Washington Post detail Trump’s February 12 call with Putin, where he pushed for peace talks, followed by a tepid nod to Zelensky. Sachs sees this as a breakthrough: “The war ends when a U.S. president says to Putin, ‘NATO enlargement was a bad idea.’” On X, @wyattreed13 (February 13) dubbed it “prophetic,” suggesting Trump’s dealmaking could unravel the conflict Biden fueled.

But here’s the provocation: Trump’s plan freezes out Ukraine and Europe, treating them as bystanders in their own fate. Zelensky’s protests—“We won’t accept agreements without us”—ring hollow against Trump’s blunt logic: “You’ve had three years to end it; you didn’t.” The media, predictably, howls betrayal, but Sachs might argue it’s the first honest U.S. move in decades—acknowledging Russia’s security fears instead of stoking them.

The Cyber Voice Take: A War of Hubris

The Ukraine war isn’t Putin’s alone—it’s a monster born of U.S. arrogance, NATO’s overreach, and Zelensky’s NATO flirtation, all egged on by Biden’s war hawks. Sachs’ hypothesis lays bare the provocation: this was never unprovoked, but a slow-motion train wreck the West engineered. The mainstream media, lapdogs of power, sold us a fairy tale while Ukraine burned. Now, Trump’s gambit—however brash—might cut through the fog, bypassing the pawns to face the real players. On X, the sentiment is clear: the public’s waking up. Will the media? Don’t hold your breath—they’re too busy polishing Biden’s legacy to notice the blood on their hands.

Stay tuned to The Cyber Voice for unfiltered truth in a world of spin.

Trump vs. Zelenskyy: Is This the Beginning of the End for Ukraine’s Wartime President?

Adrian Fuller
-
0
Trump vs. Zelenskyy: Is This the Beginning of the End for Ukraine’s Wartime President?

The escalating tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy have reached a critical juncture, raising profound questions about the future of Ukraine’s leadership and sovereignty. Trump’s recent remarks, branding Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections” and accusing him of mismanaging U.S. aid, have not only strained bilateral relations but also ignited a firestorm of international debate.

Trump’s Provocative Accusations

Donald Trump calling Volodymyr Zelenskyy out as a dictator

In a series of statements, President Trump has been unrelenting in his criticism of Zelenskyy. He has questioned the legitimacy of Ukraine’s leadership, suggesting that Zelenskyy’s background as a comedian renders him ill-equipped for presidential duties. Moreover, Trump has insinuated that the substantial financial aid provided by the U.S. has been misappropriated under Zelenskyy’s watch, prolonging the conflict for personal gain. These assertions have been disseminated through various platforms, including his own Truth Social account.

International and Domestic Reactions

Trump’s comments have elicited a spectrum of responses from political figures and analysts worldwide. In the United States, members of his own party have expressed unease. Senator Susan Collins of Maine voiced her “tremendous admiration” for President Zelenskyy, implicitly rebuking Trump’s characterization. Similarly, Senator Lindsey Graham emphasized that Russia’s invasion initiated the conflict, countering Trump’s narrative. These reactions underscore a growing rift within the GOP regarding U.S. policy toward Ukraine.

European leaders have also been vocal in their support for Zelenskyy. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer described Zelenskyy as a “democratically elected leader” and defended the suspension of elections in Ukraine during wartime, drawing parallels to historical precedents such as the UK’s own suspension of elections during World War II. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz labeled Trump’s remarks as “simply wrong and dangerous,” reaffirming Europe’s commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Implications for Zelenskyy’s Presidency

The crux of the matter lies in the potential ramifications of Trump’s rhetoric on Zelenskyy’s tenure. By casting doubt on Zelenskyy’s legitimacy and governance, Trump appears to be undermining international support for Ukraine at a critical juncture. This strategy not only emboldens Russian aggression but also sows discord among Ukraine’s allies, potentially isolating Zelenskyy on the global stage.

Furthermore, Trump’s insinuations regarding the misuse of U.S. aid could erode confidence among other donor nations, leading to a potential reduction in essential support for Ukraine’s defense efforts. This financial strain, coupled with the psychological impact of diminished international backing, could destabilize Zelenskyy’s administration and embolden opposition forces within Ukraine.

A Calculated Strategy?

Some political observers posit that Trump’s approach may be a calculated strategy aimed at realigning U.S. foreign policy interests. By pressuring Ukraine into negotiations favorable to Russia, Trump could be seeking to extricate the U.S. from prolonged involvement in Eastern European conflicts, thereby reallocating resources to domestic priorities. However, this realignment comes at the potential cost of compromising democratic values and the sovereignty of an allied nation.

Conclusion

The intensifying discord between Presidents Trump and Zelenskyy raises pressing questions about the future of Ukraine’s leadership and its struggle against external aggression. As international alliances are tested and internal divisions deepen, the resilience of Zelenskyy’s presidency hangs in the balance. The coming months will be pivotal in determining whether Ukraine can withstand these multifaceted challenges or if Zelenskyy’s tenure will succumb to the mounting pressures orchestrated by both foreign and domestic adversaries.

Researchers Release Uncensored Version of DeepSeek-R1 as Open Source

Alex
-
0
Researchers Release Uncensored Version of DeepSeek-R1 as Open Source

A research team from the U.S.-based AI startup Perplexity has developed a modified version of the Chinese AI language model DeepSeek-R1 and released it as open source.

This new model, called “R1 1776”, has been adjusted to operate without the original censorship restrictions. The original DeepSeek-R1 adhered to Beijing’s censorship policies and refused to answer certain sensitive topics, such as Taiwan, the Uyghur minority in China, and the events of Tiananmen Square in 1989.

By applying special retraining techniques, the researchers successfully removed these limitations, allowing the model to respond freely to such topics while maintaining its original strengths in mathematics and logical reasoning.

The model is now available via the Hugging Face repository and can also be accessed through the Sonar API. The source code has been released under an open-source license, making it accessible for researchers and developers worldwide.

Longrevity: The New Lifestyle Trend for a Longer, Healthier Life

Alex
-
0
Longrevity: The New Lifestyle Trend for a Longer, Healthier Life

The quest for eternal youth is as old as humanity itself. While it was once merely a dream, modern science, biohacking, and holistic wellness have turned longevity into an achievable goal. But today, it’s no longer just about living longer—it’s about living better. Enter Longrevity, the fusion of longevity and vitality, a trend that is reshaping how we approach aging, health, and performance.

What is Longrevity?

Longrevity is not just about adding years to life but adding life to years. It represents a proactive, high-performance approach to aging that blends cutting-edge science with ancient wisdom. It’s where biohacking meets holistic well-being, where technology meets natural healing.

From Silicon Valley executives to wellness influencers, Longrevity is rapidly becoming the new status symbol. It’s no longer about being wealthy—it’s about being healthy and optimized.

The Key Pillars of Longrevity

1. Precision Nutrition & Fasting

Forget outdated diet trends—Longrevity embraces precision nutrition, using AI, microbiome testing, and genetic analysis to tailor diets for maximum longevity. Fasting techniques like intermittent fasting, autophagy-boosting diets, and calorie restriction are key to cellular regeneration and lifespan extension.

2. Biohacking & Longevity Tech

The rise of wearable tech, continuous glucose monitors, red light therapy, cryotherapy, and nootropics allows individuals to optimize their health at a granular level. AI-driven health monitoring is now a game-changer, predicting potential health risks before they even arise.

3. Mind-Body Connection & Stress Optimization

Mental well-being is just as critical as physical health. Practices like meditation, breathwork, adaptogens, and psychedelics are becoming mainstream tools for stress resilience and cognitive enhancement. The goal? Longevity with clarity, focus, and emotional stability.

4. Movement & Recovery Science

It’s not just about working out—it’s about working out smarter. Longevity-focused training includes mobility drills, blood flow restriction workouts, cold exposure, and sleep tracking to enhance muscle regeneration and energy efficiency.

5. Cutting-Edge Longevity Science

From NAD+ boosters, senolytics, and stem cell therapy to advancements in gene editing and anti-aging drugs, the biotech world is unlocking ways to slow down (or even reverse) aging.

Why Longrevity is More Than Just a Trend

Longrevity isn’t just a buzzword—it’s a movement redefining success. In a world where performance, mental agility, and well-being determine our ability to thrive, investing in health has never been more valuable. The elite of tomorrow won’t just be wealthy; they will be biologically optimized, resilient, and limitless.

Are you ready to tap into the future of health? The Longrevity era is here—live longer, live stronger.

Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE:ANET) Shares Acquired by Blue Trust Inc.

Lucas Peterson
-
0

Blue Trust Inc. lifted its position in shares of Arista Networks, Inc. (NYSE:ANET – Free Report) by 13.3% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 2,990 shares of the technology company’s stock after purchasing an additional 352 shares during the period. Blue Trust Inc.’s holdings in Arista Networks were worth $330,000 as of its most recent SEC filing.

A number of other institutional investors have also made changes to their positions in ANET. Swedbank AB raised its holdings in Arista Networks by 293.2% in the fourth quarter. Swedbank AB now owns 6,750,793 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $746,165,000 after acquiring an additional 5,034,022 shares in the last quarter. WCM Investment Management LLC raised its holdings in Arista Networks by 292.8% in the fourth quarter. WCM Investment Management LLC now owns 6,053,181 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $674,627,000 after acquiring an additional 4,512,166 shares in the last quarter. Jennison Associates LLC raised its holdings in Arista Networks by 307.7% in the fourth quarter. Jennison Associates LLC now owns 4,632,730 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $512,056,000 after acquiring an additional 3,496,497 shares in the last quarter. Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group Inc. raised its holdings in Arista Networks by 306.9% in the fourth quarter. Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group Inc. now owns 2,433,425 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $268,966,000 after acquiring an additional 1,835,421 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC raised its holdings in shares of Arista Networks by 322.9% during the fourth quarter. Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC now owns 2,323,157 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $259,557,000 after purchasing an additional 1,773,777 shares during the period. 82.47% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds.

Get Arista Networks alerts:

Arista Networks Stock Up 3.9 %

Shares of ANET opened at $111.05 on Wednesday. The firm has a 50-day moving average price of $113.95 and a 200 day moving average price of $101.32. The firm has a market capitalization of $139.89 billion, a PE ratio of 53.39, a P/E/G ratio of 3.10 and a beta of 1.09. Arista Networks, Inc. has a 52-week low of $60.08 and a 52-week high of $133.57.

Insider Activity at Arista Networks

Arista Networks ( NYSE:ANET Get Free Report ) last announced its earnings results on Tuesday, February 18th. The technology company reported $0.59 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.57 by $0.02. Arista Networks had a net margin of 40.29% and a return on equity of 30.52%. On average, equities analysts expect that Arista Networks, Inc. will post 1.97 EPS for the current year.

In other Arista Networks news, insider John F. Mccool sold 6,340 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, November 21st. The shares were sold at an average price of $98.58, for a total value of $625,013.05. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now directly owns 288 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $28,391.76. This represents a 95.65 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, Director Kelly Bodnar Battles sold 1,488 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, February 14th. The shares were sold at an average price of $107.13, for a total transaction of $159,409.44. Following the completion of the sale, the director now directly owns 8,128 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $870,752.64. The trade was a 15.47 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders sold 337,320 shares of company stock worth $37,946,706 in the last 90 days. Corporate insiders own 3.54% of the company’s stock.

Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth

A number of analysts have weighed in on ANET shares. StockNews.com cut shares of Arista Networks from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Thursday, December 12th. Morgan Stanley increased their target price on shares of Arista Networks from $102.50 to $118.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a report on Tuesday, December 17th. Rosenblatt Securities reissued a “sell” rating and set a $80.00 target price on shares of Arista Networks in a report on Tuesday. UBS Group increased their target price on shares of Arista Networks from $92.25 to $106.25 and gave the stock a “neutral” rating in a report on Friday, November 8th. Finally, Evercore ISI increased their target price on shares of Arista Networks from $110.00 to $130.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a report on Friday, January 17th. One equities research analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, three have issued a hold rating and twelve have given a buy rating to the company. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $107.59.

Check Out Our Latest Report on Arista Networks

Arista Networks Profile

(Free Report)

Arista Networks, Inc engages in the development, marketing, and sale of data-driven, client to cloud networking solutions for data center, campus, and routing environments in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific. Its cloud networking solutions consist of Extensible Operating System (EOS), a publish-subscribe state-sharing networking operating system offered in combination with a set of network applications.

See Also

Receive News & Ratings for Arista Networks Daily – Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts’ ratings for Arista Networks and related companies with MarketBeat.com’s FREE daily email newsletter.

NDSA Final Report on Medigadda by Month End

Lucas Peterson
-
0

Hyderabad: The much-awaited final report from the National Dam Safety Authority (NDSA) on the future of Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla barrages of the Kaleshwaram lift irrigation scheme will be sent to the state government by the end of this month.

The government has been waiting for the report and is expected to take further steps based on the recommendations.

That the report will be submitted to the state was informed to irrigation minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy by Union Jal Shakti minister C.R. Patil at a meeting in Udaipur on Wednesday.

It is learnt that the NDSA has come to a conclusion that the problems at Medigadda barrage’s Block 7, portion of which cracked and sank, and those at Annaram and Sundilla which developed serious leaks under their foundations, were the result of poor design, using the barrages like dams — something for which they were not designed– with continuous and excess storage of water which exacerbated the problems, and lack of regular inspections and maintenance.

Among the likely solutions for the rehabilitation of Medigadda barrage, according to sources, are rebuilding the damaged Block 7 while strengthening its adjacent Blocks 6 and 8.

After the October 2023 incident at Medigadda where a portion of the barrage developed cracks and sank into the Godavari river bed, the then BRS government had asked the NDSA to inspect and suggest measures for repairs and rehabilitation of the barrage. However, the BRS government took issue with the initial findings that maintenance and design issues may have resulted in the disaster. The NDSA, later submitted interim recommendations including some regarding temporary repairs, to keep the barrage gates open, and a series of tests at all the three KLIS barrages.

The NDSA has submitted its final report to the Jal Shakti Ministry which will vet it and send it to the state.

123...88Page 2 of 88

At The Cyber Voice, we are dedicated to illuminating the intricate tapestry of our evolving cyber society. Through incisive journalism and informed perspectives, we strive to be the beacon for those navigating the digital realm. From politics and finance to cryptocurrencies and lifestyle, we commit to delivering unbiased, comprehensive, and forward-thinking narratives that empower our readers to stay informed, engaged, and ahead of the curve in an ever-changing digital landscape.

Contact us: office@thecyvo.com

© Copyright - Circle Point LLC